Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 11(8)2022 Jul 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1957210

ABSTRACT

This scoping review aimed to explore the prevalence and patterns of global antibiotic use and bacterial infection in COVID-19 patients from studies published between June 2020 and March 2021. This review was reported in line with the Preferred Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for Scoping Reviews, and the protocol is registered with the Open Science Framework. Compared with our previously-published review of the period (December 2019-June 2020), the antibiotic prescribing rate for COVID-19 patients (June 2020-March 2021) was found to have declined overall (82.3% vs. 39.7%), for mild and moderate patients (75.1% vs. 15.5%), and for severe and critical patients (75.3% vs. 48.3%). The seven most frequently prescribed antibiotics in COVID-19 patients were all on the "Watch" list of the WHO AWaRe antibiotics classification. The overall reported bacterial infection rate in COVID-19 patients was 10.5%, and the most frequently reported resistant pathogen in COVID-19 patients was Staphylococcus aureus, followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. There is an urgent need to establish comprehensive and consistent guidelines to assist clinicians in selecting appropriate antibiotics for COVID-19 patients when needed. The resistance data on the most frequently used antibiotics for COVID-19 patients for certain resistant pathogens should be closely monitored.

2.
BMJ Open ; 12(1): e048267, 2022 Jan 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1604369

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Up to 80% of patients with respiratory tract infections (RTI) attending healthcare facilities in rural areas of China are prescribed antibiotics, many of which are unnecessary. Since 2009, China has implemented several policies to try to reduce inappropriate antibiotic use; however, antibiotic prescribing remains high in rural health facilities. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A cluster randomised controlled trial will be carried out to estimate the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a complex intervention in reducing antibiotic prescribing at township health centres in Anhui Province, China. 40 Township health centres will be randomised at a 1:1 ratio to the intervention or usual care arms. In the intervention group, practitioners will receive an intervention comprising: (1) training to support appropriate antibiotic prescribing for RTI, (2) a computer-based treatment decision support system, (3) virtual peer support, (4) a leaflet for patients and (5) a letter of commitment to optimise antibiotic use to display in their clinic. The primary outcome is the percentage of antibiotics (intravenous and oral) prescribed for RTI patients. Secondary outcomes include patient symptom severity and duration, recovery status, satisfaction, antibiotic consumption. A full economic evaluation will be conducted within the trial period. Costs and savings for both clinics and patients will be considered and quality of life will be measured by EuroQoL (EQ-5D-5L). A qualitative process evaluation will explore practitioner and patient views and experiences of trial processes, intervention fidelity and acceptability, and barriers and facilitators to implementation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of Anhui Medical University (Ref: 20180259); the study has undergone due diligence checks and is registered at the University of Bristol (Ref: 2020-3137). Research findings will be disseminated to stakeholders through conferences and peer-reviewed journals in China, the UK and internationally. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN30652037.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Respiratory Tract Infections , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , China , Humans , Inappropriate Prescribing/prevention & control , Primary Health Care , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy
3.
Cell Discov ; 7(1): 82, 2021 Sep 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1397862

ABSTRACT

The pandemic of COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 has raised a new challenges to the scientific and industrious fields after over 1-year spread across different countries. The ultimate approach to end the pandemic is the timely application of vaccines to achieve herd immunity. Here, a novel SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) homodimer was developed as a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate. Formulated with aluminum adjuvant, RBD dimer elicited strong immune response in both rodents and non-human primates, and protected mice from SARS-CoV-2 challenge with significantly reducing viral load and alleviating pathological injury in the lung. In the non-human primates, the vaccine could prevent majority of the animals from SARS-CoV-2 infection in the respiratory tract and reduce lung damage. In addition, antibodies elicited by this vaccine candidate showed cross-neutralization activities to SARS-CoV-2 variants. Furthermore, with our expression system, we provided a high-yield RBD homodimer vaccine without additional biosafety or special transport device supports. Thus, it may serve as a safe, effective, and low-cost SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate.

4.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 10(6)2021 Jun 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1273376

ABSTRACT

This scoping review provides new evidence on the prevalence and patterns of global antimicrobial use in the treatment of COVID-19 patients; identifies the most commonly used antibiotics and clinical scenarios associated with antibiotic prescribing in the first phase of the pandemic; and explores the impact of documented antibiotic prescribing on treatment outcomes in COVID-19 patients. The review complies with PRISMA guidelines for Scoping Reviews and the protocol is registered with the Open Science Framework. In the first six months of the pandemic, there was a similar mean antibiotic prescribing rate between patients with severe or critical illness (75.4%) and patients with mild or moderate illness (75.1%). The proportion of patients prescribed antibiotics without clinical justification was 51.5% vs. 41.9% for patients with mild or moderate illness and those with severe or critical illness. Comparison of patients who were provided antibiotics with a clinical justification with those who were given antibiotics without clinical justification showed lower mortality rates (9.5% vs. 13.1%), higher discharge rates (80.9% vs. 69.3%), and shorter length of hospital stay (9.3 days vs. 12.2 days). In the first 6 months of the pandemic, antibiotics were prescribed for COVID-19 patients regardless of severity of illness. A large proportion of antibiotic prescribing for mild and moderate COVID-19 patients did not have clinical evidence of a bacterial co-infection. Antibiotics may not be beneficial to COVID-19 patients without clinical evidence of a bacterial co-infection.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL